In what situations would AJAX long/short polling be preferred over HTML5 WebSockets? Code Answer

Hello Developer, Hope you guys are doing great. Today at Tutorial Guruji Official website, we are sharing the answer of In what situations would AJAX long/short polling be preferred over HTML5 WebSockets? without wasting too much if your time.

The question is published on by Tutorial Guruji team.

I am building a small chat application for friends, but unsure about how to get information in a timely manner that is not as manual or as rudimentary as forcing a page refresh.

Currently, I am implementing this using simple AJAX, but this has the disadvantage of regularly hitting the server when a short timer elapses.

In researching long/short polling, I ran across HTML5 WebSockets. This seems easy to implement, but I’m not sure if there are some hidden disadvantages. For example, I think WebSockets is only supported by certain browsers. Are there other disadvantages to WebSockets that I should be aware of?

Since it seems like both technologies do the same thing, in what sorts of scenarios would one prefer to use one over the other? More specifically, has HTML5 WebSockets made AJAX long/short polling obsolete, or are there compelling reasons to prefer AJAX over WebSockets?

Answer

WebSockets is definitely the future now.

Long polling is a dirty workaround to prevent creating connections for each request like AJAX does – but long polling was created when WebSockets didn’t exist. Now due to WebSockets,
long polling is going away no more.

WebRTC allows for peer-to-peer communication.

I recommend learning WebSockets.

Comparison:

of different communication techniques on the web

  • AJAXrequestresponse. Creates a connection to the server, sends request headers with optional data, gets a response from the server, and closes the connection.
    Supported in all major browsers.

  • Long pollrequestwaitresponse. Creates a connection to the server like AJAX does, but maintains a keep-alive connection open for some time (not long though). During connection, the open client can receive data from the server. The client has to reconnect periodically after the connection is closed, due to timeouts or data eof. On server side it is still treated like an HTTP request, same as AJAX, except the answer on request will happen now or some time in the future, defined by the application logic.
    support chart (full) | wikipedia

  • WebSocketsclientserver. Create a TCP connection to the server, and keep it open as long as needed. The server or client can easily close the connection. The client goes through an HTTP compatible handshake process. If it succeeds, then the server and client can exchange data in both directions at any time. It is efficient if the application requires frequent data exchange in both ways. WebSockets do have data framing that includes masking for each message sent from client to server, so data is simply encrypted.
    support chart (very good) | wikipedia

  • WebRTCpeerpeer. Transport to establish communication between clients and is transport-agnostic, so it can use UDP, TCP or even more abstract layers. This is generally used for high volume data transfer, such as video/audio streaming, where reliability is secondary and a few frames or reduction in quality progression can be sacrificed in favour of response time and, at least, some data transfer. Both sides (peers) can push data to each other independently. While it can be used totally independent from any centralised servers, it still requires some way of exchanging endPoints data, where in most cases developers still use centralised servers to “link” peers. This is required only to exchange essential data for establishing a connection, after which a centralised server is not required.
    support chart (medium) | wikipedia

  • Server-Sent Eventsclientserver. Client establishes persistent and long-term connection to server. Only the server can send data to a client. If the client wants to send data to the server, it would require the use of another technology/protocol to do so. This protocol is HTTP compatible and simple to implement in most server-side platforms. This is a preferable protocol to be used instead of Long Polling. support chart (good, except IE) | wikipedia

Advantages:

The main advantage of WebSockets server-side, is that it is not an HTTP request (after handshake), but a proper message based communication protocol. This enables you to achieve huge performance and architecture advantages. For example, in node.js, you can share the same memory for different socket connections, so they can each access shared variables. Therefore, you don’t need to use a database as an exchange point in the middle (like with AJAX or Long Polling with a language like PHP).
You can store data in RAM, or even republish between sockets straight away.

Security considerations

People are often concerned about the security of WebSockets. The reality is that it makes little difference or even puts WebSockets as better option. First of all, with AJAX, there is a higher chance of MITM, as each request is a new TCP connection that is traversing through internet infrastructure. With WebSockets, once it’s connected it is far more challenging to intercept in between, with additionally enforced frame masking when data is streamed from client to server as well as additional compression, which requires more effort to probe data. All modern protocols support both: HTTP and HTTPS (encrypted).

P.S.

Remember that WebSockets generally have a very different approach of logic for networking, more like real-time games had all this time, and not like http.

We are here to answer your question about In what situations would AJAX long/short polling be preferred over HTML5 WebSockets? - If you find the proper solution, please don't forgot to share this with your team members.

Related Posts

Tutorial Guruji